A friend in the US recently asked whether I “can still get Google.”
Oh mercy, I can’t imagine life without Google. Because of the Great Firewall, I can’t get Facebook, I can’t see anything on YouTube, I can’t read any blogs on blogspot.com and, in the past, I have been unable to access Wikipedia at all. Time was when we could get to all of these by going to a proxy server website and then visit the blocked sites; there was even a site that emailed the “new” proxy servers that popped up in the cat-and-mouse game with the powers that be; all you had to do when your favorite proxy server was shut down was move on to another. Those were the good ol’ days, though, as things have gotten much tighter. Today there are a couple of proxy servers that you can sign up for if you pay about $50 (US) a year or so, but I won’t mention names lest I speed up their shutdown, too.
But I can still Google. In fact, that’s what I do when I am out of the house and can’t find whatever destination I’m looking for. There is no giant phonebook, no yellow pages. When I am lost (as I invariably am, always sure that the shop or restaurant is “right around here”), I Google my target on my iPhone and find the address. If I go to google.com, I am frequently, but not always, automatically re-directed to google.cn.
As for the big ruckus with Google recently…. a few thoughts. First is that when it envisioned China as a huge market that it didn’t want to pass on, Google originally had no problem with whiting out certain search results in China. Type in something politically sensitive, and it wasn’t merely that you couldn’t access certain sites that were shown as search results — you didn’t see that they existed at all. So why did Google get all upset about freedom of information in the last few months?
Maybe because it wasn’t such a business success after all? More than one person here has pointed out that most Chinese use baidu.com to search the web, not Google. (In fact, western reporters measuring Chinese attention to President Obama’s visit last fall by counting hits on Google were barking up the wrong tree. They should have been watching baidu.com. (See the comment at http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/opinion/20friedman.html.)) And I’m informed that there is a Chinese social networking site roughly comparable to Facebook. Some people here say that China is entitled to protect these Chinese sites until they are strong enough to compete with Google and Facebook; others think that blocking these sites is the same kind of economic trade barrier as any other and should be called out as such.
But after all the brouhaha, here’s what I saw in the subway last week:
Prominent ads, which I haven’t seen before. It doesn’t look like Google is going anywhere if they are launching an ad campaign.
Today when I type in google.com, it doesn’t redirect me. And when I type in a sensitive topic, I can see that there are entries on Wikipedia and YouTube, among others. Only time will tell if this will hold true.
But try clicking on them, and here’s what I get:
Instantly. And if I type in the same request on google.cn, I get pretty much the same results.
Strictly from the perspective of my personal needs, I hope that Google does stick around. Otherwise, I’ll never find where I’m going, or I’ll have to go back to lugging the huge files of business cards that I carried in my early days in Shanghai. Or I will have to seriously speed up my study of Chinese characters!

Firecrackers went off randomly, as if they were practicing, just getting warmed up. Too cold, I ate some dumplings and went home.

